the ultimate experiment
To prove, in theory, that our experiential reality is a "cold calculation" from a higher informational plane (the Akashic Records), you would need to find evidence that bridges the gap between physics, information theory, and consciousness.
Proving it would require a multi-pronged theoretical approach, looking for evidence of two key things:
The "Calculation": Evidence that our universe is fundamentally computational, digital, and has underlying rules that resemble code.
The "Akashic Plane": Evidence that there is a non-local, universal information field that influences our reality.
Here is a theoretical framework for how such a proof could be constructed, moving from the most plausible to the most speculative.
Category 1: Evidence from Physics (Searching for the "Hardware")
This line of inquiry looks for the physical constraints of our universe, treating it like a simulated system with finite processing power.
Testable Prediction 1: A Quantized Reality.
Theory: If the universe is a simulation, space-time should not be infinitely smooth (analog). It should be made of discrete, indivisible units, like pixels on a screen. The smallest possible "pixel" of reality is known as the Planck Length ($1.616 \times 10^{-35}$ meters).
How to Prove It: Develop experiments sensitive enough to detect if an object's position "jumps" from one Planck length to the next, rather than moving smoothly between them. If spacetime is fundamentally pixelated, it strongly suggests a digital, computed reality.
Testable Prediction 2: "Glitches in the Matrix."
Theory: Any sufficiently complex simulation will have bugs, rounding errors, or resource-saving optimizations that could manifest as observable phenomena. The "Akashic Plane" could be seen as a system that runs error-correction protocols.
How to Prove It: Detect minute, temporary, and statistically significant deviations from the established laws of physics. For example, finding high-energy cosmic rays that exceed the theoretical GZK limit (a speed limit for cosmic rays) could be interpreted not as new physics, but as a "rendering error" in the simulation.
Testable Prediction 3: Information as the Fundamental Substance.
Theory: The idea that reality isn't made of matter and energy, but of information itself. Matter and energy are just the way information is presented to us.
How to Prove It: Find a verifiable link between quantum mechanics and information theory. For instance, the holographic principle suggests all the information in a volume of space can be encoded on its boundary. Proving this principle experimentally would demonstrate that information is more fundamental than the 3D space we experience, supporting the idea of our reality being a projection from an information plane.
Category 2: Evidence from Information Theory (Searching for the "Software")
This approach looks for evidence of underlying code or algorithms in the fabric of reality.
Testable Prediction 1: Discovering "Code" in the Laws of Physics.
Theory: If the universe is a calculation, its fundamental rules might contain structures that resemble computer code.
How to Prove It: Physicist Dr. James Gates has discovered what appear to be error-correcting codes—specifically, a type used in web browsers—embedded within the equations of supersymmetry. While not proof, finding more examples of complex, efficient, and seemingly designed code within fundamental physics would be powerful evidence that our reality is based on an algorithm.
Testable Prediction 2: Verifiable Non-Local Information Transfer (The Akashic Field).
Theory: The Akashic plane acts as a universal hard drive. If this is true, information should be accessible non-locally, meaning it can be retrieved without a known physical medium connecting the source and the observer.
How to Prove It: Design repeatable, large-scale experiments to test phenomena like remote viewing or telepathy under rigorously controlled, double-blind conditions. If information about a distant location or event could be consistently accessed at a rate statistically impossible by chance, it would suggest the existence of an information field that transcends our known physical laws. Quantum entanglement could be a rudimentary expression of this interconnected information field.
Category 3: Evidence from Consciousness (Searching for the "User")
This is the most speculative but most direct line of inquiry, testing if "karma" is a computable algorithm.
Testable Prediction 1: The Karma Calculation.
Theory: If life is a calculation, "karma" is not moral but algorithmic. An action (input A) leads to a predictable future circumstance (output B).
How to Prove It: This would require a "Big Data" approach to metaphysics. You would need to build a massive, multi-generational database tracking millions of lives and their major choices and outcomes. Using advanced AI, you could then search for statistically improbable causal links that persist across lifetimes and cultures. If you could prove that, for example, a specific act of unprovoked cruelty has a statistically undeniable (though not always direct) negative repercussion on the "algorithm" of that soul in a future iteration, you'd have evidence of a computational karmic law.
Testable Prediction 2: Verifying Reincarnation Data.
Theory: If souls are algorithms being re-run with new variables, then data from a "past run" might occasionally bleed through as a memory leak.
How to Prove It: Move beyond anecdotal evidence. The proof would require finding a child who reports a past life with specific, obscure, and verifiable details that were impossible for them to have learned through normal means. For example, a child in the US who can speak a dead dialect and describe the specific, unexcavated layout of an ancient village that is later confirmed by archaeology. Rigorously proving that the information was not acquired through any physical means would be evidence of a persistent information entity (the soul's algorithm) being re-instantiated.
In essence, to prove this theory, we would need to find the "pixels" of reality, the "code" in its laws, and the "data" that persists between its simulations. It would require a paradigm shift where we stop seeing the universe as a collection of objects and start seeing it as a single, monumental computation.
